🔗 Share this article

Tehran is ready to restart atomic talks with the United States provided that it is approached with "dignity" and "respect", Iran's foreign minister has declared.

Abbas Araghchi said only diplomacy produced results, and shared recent overtures had come from intermediaries to resume negotiations with the American leadership. He claimed Iran possessed no unreported enrichment locations, and Iran could not yet allow the International Atomic Energy Agency to visit attacked atomic facilities for security reasons.

Walking a Difficult Path

The foreign minister is navigating a complex course since Iran aims to avoid be seen to be proceeding from a stance of vulnerability, and he consistently maintained that Iran had emerged stronger militarily and emotionally from the coordinated strike on its enrichment centers in June.

He was talking at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "an absolute privilege to refine atomic fuel on home soil that it will always maintain" – the key factor of the deadlock in the prior discussions.

Earlier Discussions Unexpectedly Ended

The prior phases of negotiations between the US and Iran were ended suddenly and acrimonious conclusion on 12 June when the Israeli government, with Washington's assistance, struck Tehran's atomic facilities in a two-week conflict that culminated with the US president claiming the facilities had been destroyed. Subsequently, Western states used their privilege to reimpose global restrictions, but Iran asserts they have not had a significant effect.

Magic Solution Proposed

Iran's diplomats said they felt they had attained a "magic solution" to the uranium processing matter in prior discussions, when it was agreed an Iran-based consortium with American involvement could enrich uranium. The two nations would have been able to assert triumph since home-based processing would have continued and the US could be assured that Iran's atomic project was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been agreed in the discussions that Washington's technical specialists could operate on Iranian soil, but that was a logical implication of the consortium proposal. Officials stated on multiple occasions they had secured an understanding with Washington's diplomat Steve Witkoff only for the arrangement to fall apart due to "spoilers in Washington".

Existing Situation

Iranian officials stated the partnership proposal was now off the table, but it seems quite possible the proposal could be reintroduced in certain ways if talks reopen.

The American leader last week stated he had been receiving messages that Iran desired to resume discussions, but in private Tehran representatives state they are not yet obtaining clear proposals from Washington either directly or from key regional mediators, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Iran's state department has been charged of inactivity in the face of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Iran says dialogue is not part of a show.

Negotiating Position

In his address to the gathering, aimed to depict the US as a dominant force that exploits the notion of worldwide standards, the foreign minister stated the fortnight-long engagement demonstrated the conflict could not be resolved by armed force. He asserted the strikes started with a US demand for an total Iran submission and ended with an unconditional call for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is certain the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were executed with full US knowledge and coordination, making faith challenging to rebuild.

Dialogue Stays the Final Resolution

Araghchi said: "It was not Iran that had abandoned dialogue; it was the United States and the Western nations that had always sought to impose their demands during the discussions. Diplomacy can still be viable and continues the final solution to settle disagreements, but its requirements, regulations and tenets must be adhered to."

"Provided that they talk to the Iranian people with the approach of respect and honor, they will get a response in the same language."

Recovery and Reconstruction

In what is described by Tehran representatives as the conflict of restoration and recovery, the foreign minister said he was assured Iran's military capacities "are much stronger than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been restored. We gained numerous insights from this engagement; we have identified our internal vulnerabilities and the shortcomings of the enemy."

He continued: "We successfully passed this war. Our atomic expertise, which they planned to eliminate, continues to exist. The facilities and gear, if eliminated, will be rebuilt; what is crucial is the will of the citizens of Tehran and then the social solidarity that they sought to undermine, but did not succeed to destroy. The nation of Iran have grown more resilient, more integrated, and more backing of the leadership and the state in the aftermath of this attack."